Search found 10 matches
- 04 Mar 2017, 15:53
- Forum: General Discussion
- Replies: 16
- Views: 7015
Re: Investigating Noesis
What an amazing post and testimony, @ai_enabled! Thank you for sharing. I am in agreement with your sentiment. Noesis has really come out of nowhere (well, for those who haven't had their hands in it for 3.5 years. :D ) and it sort of seems like it is taking the .NET world by storm ATM. I am thinkin...
- 03 Mar 2017, 13:02
- Forum: General Discussion
- Replies: 16
- Views: 7015
Re: Investigating Noesis
Hey Team Noesis, congratulations on the v2.0 launch! I have been taking advantage of the new free-to-indie licensing and checking out your wares. :) There was also a wicked awesome suggestion by your Twitter handle to possibly create a kickstarter to address the very popular request of a ubiquitous ...
- 02 Feb 2017, 11:26
- Forum: General Discussion
- Replies: 16
- Views: 7015
Re: Investigating Noesis
Ah, OK @jsantos thank you for letting me know. That would for sure be something I would be interested in before getting my hands dirty here. Markup extensions are what make Xaml so powerful. I will keep an eye out!
- 28 Jan 2017, 22:00
- Forum: General Discussion
- Replies: 16
- Views: 7015
Re: Investigating Noesis
Hey that's great to hear @ai_enabled! Thanks for letting me know. I guess my primary concern is using markup extensions first and foremost. That is what makes Xaml Xaml, IMO. Then there's WPF-centric functionality such as interaction behaviors and triggers, as well. That's what comes to mind in chec...
- 28 Jan 2017, 02:04
- Forum: General Discussion
- Replies: 16
- Views: 7015
Re: Investigating Noesis
Ah, this isn't rendering but serialization. As you are probably already painfully aware of, System.Xaml is a way of persisting (and loading) POCOs out of (and into) memory. Once it is in memory is when the rendering (or data manipulation, etc) occurs. Of course, it offers so much more than serializa...
- 26 Jan 2017, 19:13
- Forum: General Discussion
- Replies: 9
- Views: 3824
Re: Ammy integration (C#)
UWP is terrible and an embarrassment. It's as if no one knows what they are doing there, nor do they care.
In any case, Noesis has taken the lead now. It will be interesting to see how evolves, indeed.
In any case, Noesis has taken the lead now. It will be interesting to see how evolves, indeed.
- 26 Jan 2017, 18:45
- Forum: General Discussion
- Replies: 9
- Views: 3824
Re: Ammy integration (C#)
Ammy... so hot right now.
- 26 Jan 2017, 01:20
- Forum: General Discussion
- Replies: 16
- Views: 7015
Re: Investigating Noesis
Wow, excellent, @jsantos! Thank you for the detailed reply. After some thinking about this, I recalled why I stopped looking into Noesis, and that is because back in Sept 2015 when I checked this out, Unity3D was the only viable 3D engine around it, and it was only supporting .NET 3.5. Since it supp...
- 25 Jan 2017, 13:25
- Forum: General Discussion
- Replies: 16
- Views: 7015
Investigating Noesis
Wow. :) I recall checking out this project over a year ago, but I do not recall it being so impressive. There looks like there is better integration with Visual Studio, and that might have been the deal breaker for me at the time. I was also probably turned off by the fact that this is a licensed/pa...
- 19 Sep 2015, 23:56
- Forum: General Discussion
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2771
Re: XNA / MonoGame integration
Hello... I am also interested in MonoGame support. Is this possible yet?
Thank you.
Michael
Thank you.
Michael