Search found 86 matches

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 9
by KeldorKatarn
29 Sep 2017, 22:05
Forum: General Discussion
Replies: 43
Views: 7860

Re: Caliburn.Micro port issues

This is the 'meta ticket': #1158
by KeldorKatarn
29 Sep 2017, 21:44
Forum: General Discussion
Replies: 43
Views: 7860

Re: Caliburn.Micro port issues

Alright, recreated the repository. there's now no history but that's no issue. most of that was just "setup, update Noesis version, update Noesis Verion, get this sample to work..." =) This should be a good starting point, you can see that I still commented out quite a bit of the caliburn code, but ...
by KeldorKatarn
29 Sep 2017, 20:04
Forum: General Discussion
Replies: 43
Views: 7860

Re: Caliburn.Micro port issues

Sure no problem, I totally forgot about that. I'll take the repository down and make a new one with only my code tomorrow. It's getting late here ;) I'll try to create tickets for all these necessary changes tomorrow as well. It'll give me a chance to clean up my repository a bit, which I need to do...
by KeldorKatarn
29 Sep 2017, 19:22
Forum: General Discussion
Replies: 43
Views: 7860

Re: Caliburn.Micro port issues

Just to make communicating about things a bit easier: https://github.com/KeldorKatarn/Caliburn.Micro.Noesis It's pretty messy still but this way other people can look at the code. Once we get this thing working well enough I'll probably recreate a repository as a Caliburn.Micro fork so any updates t...
by KeldorKatarn
29 Sep 2017, 19:06
Forum: General Discussion
Replies: 43
Views: 7860

Re: Caliburn.Micro port issues

And another thing that I think I mentioned before: public static ElementConvention AddElementConvention<T>(DependencyProperty bindableProperty, string parameterProperty, string eventName) { return AddElementConvention(new ElementConvention { ElementType = typeof(T), GetBindableProperty = element => ...
by KeldorKatarn
29 Sep 2017, 19:01
Forum: General Discussion
Replies: 43
Views: 7860

Re: Caliburn.Micro port issues

The next huge thing, without which a lot in caliburn won't work (for tab controls and item controls, is making this possible: public static DataTemplate DefaultHeaderTemplate = (DataTemplate) #if SILVERLIGHT || WinRT XamlReader.Load( #else XamlReader.Parse( #endif "<DataTemplate xmlns='http://schema...
by KeldorKatarn
29 Sep 2017, 18:39
Forum: General Discussion
Replies: 43
Views: 7860

Re: Caliburn.Micro port issues

Ok the first problem seems to be that ItemCollection doesn't properly implement the Enumerable interfaces. That way I cannot use the OfType() extension method, not implement such a method myself since I cannot use yield without ItemCollection implementing the IEnumerable interface. I think I can wor...
by KeldorKatarn
28 Sep 2017, 20:23
Forum: General Discussion
Replies: 43
Views: 7860

Re: Caliburn.Micro port issues

Forget it, for this case it's actually not a problem. I don't need the Noesis namespace in that file at all, so I can just remove the using statement and it uses the .NET version automatically. But it might still turn into a problem for other people when they use both the System.Reflection namespace...
by KeldorKatarn
28 Sep 2017, 19:38
Forum: General Discussion
Replies: 43
Views: 7860

Re: Caliburn.Micro port issues

Ok the first problem, at least when using the 4.6 runtime: Assets/Caliburn.Micro.Noesis/Scripts/PortableReflectionExtensions.cs(25,22): error CS0121: The call is ambiguous between the following methods or properties: `System.Reflection.IntrospectionExtensions.GetTypeInfo(this System.Type)' and `Noes...
by KeldorKatarn
28 Sep 2017, 19:30
Forum: General Discussion
Replies: 43
Views: 7860

Re: Caliburn.Micro port issues

Alright good stuff, that one installs without any issues. And since Unity now posted a temporary workaround for their DNS Server issue I might actually be able to try this again. Somehow I always have the greatest timing for coming back to things when everbody is either having issues or is juuuust a...
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 9