Search found 96 matches
- 29 Sep 2017, 22:05
- Forum: General Discussion
- Replies: 43
- Views: 8731
Re: Caliburn.Micro port issues
This is the 'meta ticket': #1158
- 29 Sep 2017, 21:44
- Forum: General Discussion
- Replies: 43
- Views: 8731
Re: Caliburn.Micro port issues
Alright, recreated the repository. there's now no history but that's no issue. most of that was just "setup, update Noesis version, update Noesis Verion, get this sample to work..." =) This should be a good starting point, you can see that I still commented out quite a bit of the caliburn code, but ...
- 29 Sep 2017, 20:04
- Forum: General Discussion
- Replies: 43
- Views: 8731
Re: Caliburn.Micro port issues
Sure no problem, I totally forgot about that. I'll take the repository down and make a new one with only my code tomorrow. It's getting late here ;) I'll try to create tickets for all these necessary changes tomorrow as well. It'll give me a chance to clean up my repository a bit, which I need to do...
- 29 Sep 2017, 19:22
- Forum: General Discussion
- Replies: 43
- Views: 8731
Re: Caliburn.Micro port issues
Just to make communicating about things a bit easier: https://github.com/KeldorKatarn/Caliburn.Micro.Noesis It's pretty messy still but this way other people can look at the code. Once we get this thing working well enough I'll probably recreate a repository as a Caliburn.Micro fork so any updates t...
- 29 Sep 2017, 19:06
- Forum: General Discussion
- Replies: 43
- Views: 8731
Re: Caliburn.Micro port issues
And another thing that I think I mentioned before: public static ElementConvention AddElementConvention<T>(DependencyProperty bindableProperty, string parameterProperty, string eventName) { return AddElementConvention(new ElementConvention { ElementType = typeof(T), GetBindableProperty = element => ...
- 29 Sep 2017, 19:01
- Forum: General Discussion
- Replies: 43
- Views: 8731
Re: Caliburn.Micro port issues
The next huge thing, without which a lot in caliburn won't work (for tab controls and item controls, is making this possible: public static DataTemplate DefaultHeaderTemplate = (DataTemplate) #if SILVERLIGHT || WinRT XamlReader.Load( #else XamlReader.Parse( #endif "<DataTemplate xmlns='http://schema...
- 29 Sep 2017, 18:39
- Forum: General Discussion
- Replies: 43
- Views: 8731
Re: Caliburn.Micro port issues
Ok the first problem seems to be that ItemCollection doesn't properly implement the Enumerable interfaces. That way I cannot use the OfType() extension method, not implement such a method myself since I cannot use yield without ItemCollection implementing the IEnumerable interface. I think I can wor...
- 28 Sep 2017, 20:23
- Forum: General Discussion
- Replies: 43
- Views: 8731
Re: Caliburn.Micro port issues
Forget it, for this case it's actually not a problem. I don't need the Noesis namespace in that file at all, so I can just remove the using statement and it uses the .NET version automatically. But it might still turn into a problem for other people when they use both the System.Reflection namespace...
- 28 Sep 2017, 19:38
- Forum: General Discussion
- Replies: 43
- Views: 8731
Re: Caliburn.Micro port issues
Ok the first problem, at least when using the 4.6 runtime: Assets/Caliburn.Micro.Noesis/Scripts/PortableReflectionExtensions.cs(25,22): error CS0121: The call is ambiguous between the following methods or properties: `System.Reflection.IntrospectionExtensions.GetTypeInfo(this System.Type)' and `Noes...
- 28 Sep 2017, 19:30
- Forum: General Discussion
- Replies: 43
- Views: 8731
Re: Caliburn.Micro port issues
Alright good stuff, that one installs without any issues. And since Unity now posted a temporary workaround for their DNS Server issue I might actually be able to try this again. Somehow I always have the greatest timing for coming back to things when everbody is either having issues or is juuuust a...